Table of Content
Each defendant insurance company issues "funeral service insurance". The primary benefit of this insurance is a funeral service, and each policy states a face value for this service. In addition, an "official" or "authorized" funeral director is designated in each policy to provide the funeral service. Each policy provides that if an insured's family chooses not to avail themselves of the services of the authorized funeral director, the family receives an alternative cash payment of at least 75 per cent of the policy's face value.
Finally, the factual circumstances in Battle were quite different from those presented in this case. Liberty National Life Insurance Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Brown-Service Funeral Homes Company, Inc. (Brown-Service), had a contractual relationship by which Brown-Service agreed to furnish the commodities and services required by Liberty National's burial insurance policies. To perform its obligations under that contract, Brown-Service in turn contracted with many independent funeral homes. Upon signing a contract with Brown-Service, each funeral home became an "authorized" funeral home for servicing Liberty National's burial insurance policies.
Schoen's Funeral Home
Needs to review the security of your connection before proceeding. Neither in his brief in opposition to the motion for summary judgment nor in his pretrial memorandum of law has plaintiff quarreled with any of the factual information this court has relied upon in preparing this Ruling. A Any written agreement or oral agreement, but that there was a tacit agreement and that they operated in parallel action consensually. Q Now, let me go back and direct your attention to the funeral homes that are named as defendants in your complaint. A No, other than the tacit the arrangement which is parallel with the funeral home as far as with the insurance companies. In 1935, the Schoen family acquired the beautifully landscaped and architecturally stunning Canal Street mansion, a New Orleans landmark, and converted it to a funeral home but without any of the typical preparation areas to keep the building intact.
As defendants have observed, the four-year period of limitations for damages under § 7 of the Clayton Act begins to run from the date of the alleged acquisition. Robert's Waikiki U-Drive, Inc. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.,491 F. Supp. Thus, this court finds that plaintiff's claim under § 7 of the Clayton Act is barred by the statute of limitations insofar as it concerns the alleged acquisition by Rose-Neath of the First National Funeral Home of Shreveport. On January 30, 1981, defendants jointly moved for summary judgment. For the reasons set out hereinafter, the court agrees with defendants that plaintiff's allegations are insufficient as a matter of law.
Copy Link To Share
As the pretrial order clearly discloses, there are many questions of fact which have not been resolved. However, none of those issues of fact are material to a resolution of the legal issues addressed in this Ruling. Accordingly, defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED. After an informal status conference, the court ordered plaintiff to submit a second amended complaint, in complete conformance with the court's April 11 ruling. Plaintiff filed this document on May 27, 1980, but it also did not comply with the court's ruling. In the interest of proceeding with this rapidly aging case, the defendants apparently avoided filing further objections to the second amended complaint, choosing instead to depose plaintiff to discover the nature of his allegations.
Other homes opened in Covington, (the Schoen & Molloy Funeral Home in 1915) and in Slidell . We follow up with families after services and provide continual grief support as part of our services. A You can have an agreement by actions as well as by written or verbal word. Of the "business of insurance" as that term is used in § 2 of the McCarran-Ferguson Act.
Jacob Schoen & Son Funeral Home
In this case, however, plaintiff has directed his claims at specific provisions contained in insurance policies. In addition, though the court is unsure of the exact meaning of plaintiff's contention as stated on page 25 of the pretrial order, the court finds that this claim, as stated, is barred by the McCarran-Ferguson Act. As mentioned above, plaintiff complains that a territorial allocation "occurs" because defendant insurance companies sell only in areas where authorized funeral directors are located. There can be no question that sales of insurance policies constitute the "business of insurance" within the contemplation of the McCarran-Ferguson Act. For these reasons, the court finds that plaintiff's contentions regarding an alleged territorial allocation are specious. During the deposition, plaintiff's allegations became more clear.
A It amounts to a tacit agreement that we'll all operate in this manner. NOTES Commonwealth Life Insurance Company was dismissed from this action on February 9, 1981, after reaching a settlement with plaintiff. The fifth generation of his family to run Jacob Schoen & Son funeral home, Patrick Schoen is bringing new life and a “no request is too strange” spirit to an industry that’s become all about tailor-made farewells. In response to Coronavirus (COVID-19), we're proud to provideLive Streaming Funeral Servicesat no cost,to help keep our communities safe while connecting loved ones. Providing affordable, personalized Burials, Cremations & Pre-Need planning and services for Traditional & Non-Traditional Funerals and Memorials for all cultural backgrounds in the Greater New Orleans, LA. Send Flowers Send flowers or a gift to a service or family's home.
Share Obituary
Logansport, Minden and Coushatta constitute illegal acquisitions under § 7 of the Clayton Act. Experience the peace of mind that comes from knowing your loved ones will not be burdened during this difficult time. To leave a remembrance or condolence for a family, click on the name to open up the obituary and then choose Tribute Wall. Licensed staff members are available around the clock—24 hours a day, 7 days a week—to discuss your needs. Whether you are doing pre-planning or need to hold a service soon, we are ready to answer our phone and offer you warm, friendly, and empathetic service.
We bring together decades of experience caring for families of all cultural backgrounds and diverse walks of life. We pledge to treat you and your loved ones just like family, and we guarantee to offer services that meet all of your specifications while exceeding all of your expectations. A Insofar as the designated and authorized funeral home in connection with its affiliated insurance companies, I say they do. The court agrees with defendants' argument that plaintiff's claim regarding the alleged acquisition in 1973 has expired by operation of the statute of limitations. 15 U.S.C. § 15b establishes a four-year limitation period on an antitrust claim brought under § 7 of the Clayton Act. As mentioned previously, this action was not filed until May 17, 1978, more than four years after any acquisition which could have taken place in 1973.
In addition, there is no vertical price fixing since no "resale price" is involved. Accordingly, the court finds that plaintiff's allegations of price fixing are meritless. All of the defendant insurance companies agreed with one or more funeral homes to serve as "authorized" funeral director for their policies. Rose-Neath was the authorized funeral director for Kilpatrick, Wellman and Boone Funeral Home, Inc. for Security, and Osborn's Funeral Home, Inc. (Osborn's) for Fireside.
We are a funeral home and cremation service provider in New Orleans, LA, Metairie, LA, and Chalmette, LA. Don’t hesitate to call us so our dedicated funeral directors can assist you. 48, 53 (W.D.Pa.1971), modified on other grounds, 463 F.2d 470 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. Obviously, there is no horizontal price fixing present in this case, since there are no "arrangements" among competitors, inasmuch as the insurance companies and the funeral homes who are designated in the policies are not competitors.
In addition, plaintiff's contentions regarding tying agreements, couched as they are within the context of the issuance of funeral service policies, are clearly exempt from antitrust scrutiny under the McCarran-Ferguson Act. (Emphasis added.) This passage clearly reflects that the "parallel consensual activities" of which plaintiff complains are founded upon the insurance company defendants' use of the 75 per cent cash payment provisions in their funeral service insurance policies. As discussed above, these provisions are inherently a part of the "business of insurance", so that plaintiff's claim of a "tacit agreement" in restraint of trade is barred by the McCarran-Ferguson Act.
No comments:
Post a Comment